![]() The investigator performs the research project as planned. If the investigator receives a “yes” from the journal the research activities can start. With the acceptance of the research plan the journal also commits to publishing (online) all studies trying to replicate the original research. The only conditions are that the investigator adhere fully to the initial plan and writes a proper report. If the answer is yes, they commit to publishing the research results regardless of a positive or negative outcome (is there ever a negative result?). The editorial board should decide at that moment whether the research project is interesting enough for publication in their journal. This proposal is sent to the editorial office for review. Here are my thoughts in a few steps:īefore data acquisition the researcher should write a short synopsis of the research to be conducted, including main hypotheses, a detailed plan for data collection, the exact number of participants to be included in the study, and a detailed statistical analysis plan describing exactly which analyses are planned. To make psychological research more reliable I think the current publication model should be trashed and a new one adopted. Therefore, the quality of psychological research as currently published in our main journals is questionable. With this practice we can never be sure whether the results as published derive from predefined hypotheses and preset data analysis schemes, or from data dredging. ![]() The practice in current psychological research is that researchers first do their investigation, and only afterwards write a report about the results and try to sell that report to a journal. I think it is time for psychologists to decide on a new publication model that would certainly alleviate this problem. ![]() One of the main reasons in my opinion is that from current papers it is impossible to tell whether the conclusions are derived from predefined hypotheses and honest statistical analysis, or from data dredging, i.e., trying everything to get a significant result out of your data. The quality of psychological research as currently published in APA and related journals is questionable. ![]() Recent incidents in psychology have made me think about the state of the art of psychological research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |